On November 26, 2025, an incident occurred in the US capital, Washington, D.C., that captured global attention. Two United States National Guard soldiers were shot near the White House, the official residence of the US President, and considered the most tightly guarded area. This attack was not random, but a well-planned one, and US security agencies declared it a “targeted attack.”
This incident not only raised serious questions about America’s internal security system but also sparked a debate about refugees from Afghanistan. The suspect in the attack was identified as an Afghan citizen, Rahmanullah Lakanwal. Upon this identification, the political atmosphere heated up, and tensions regarding immigration and security policy increased.
This blog aims to examine every aspect of this incident—political, social, security, and international relations—in detail.
➡️Details of the incident—How and why the attack occurred
The incident occurred around 9:35 a.m. near the northern part of the White House, where a National Guard team was on a routine security patrol. Suddenly, a suspect opened fire, directly targeting the soldiers. Both soldiers were seriously injured in the firing and were immediately taken for medical attention.
US police and the Secret Service acted swiftly and arrested the suspect. Initial interrogation revealed that the attacker’s intention was not ordinary violence, but that he deliberately targeted security forces.
This type of attack challenged the vigilance of US intelligence, since it is considered nearly impossible to approach the White House with a weapon. But this incident proved that security is not always foolproof.
➡️Who is Rahmanullah Lakanwal—Background and Identity
The identity of the attacker gave a new dimension to the entire issue. Lakanwal was a 29-year-old Afghan citizen who fled Afghanistan and came to the United States in 2021. According to reports, he was trained in the Afghan army and served as a US-allied soldier during the rise of the Taliban government.
After the fall of Afghanistan (2021), the US granted asylum to thousands of Afghan citizens. Many were involved in supporting the US embassy or military, and their lives were in danger. Lakanwal was included in the list of these refugees and was granted entry into the US on humanitarian grounds.
However, it is worth noting that:
He was suffering from mental stress and Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder
His behavior had been observed to be unusual in the past few months
His social media accounts indicated content linked to radical ideology
This entire matter has now become a question:
“Were such individuals screened safely?”
➡️Afghanistan Connection — Political and Security Controversy
Political controversy intensified in the US following the attack. Republican Party leader and President Donald Trump called it a terrorist attack and said that the entry of Afghan refugees should be subject to re-examination.
This incident raised some serious questions:
✅ Did US security agencies properly vet the refugees?
If someone was part of the military, a weapons trainer, and later transformed with a terrorist mindset, this is a serious warning.
✅ Did Taliban supporters or extremist elements join the refugee crowd?
There is a growing debate in the US about whether organizations like the Taliban and ISIS-K could use migration as a shield.
✅ Is this the result of the failure of 20 years of US policy in Afghanistan?
The hasty withdrawal of US forces in 2021 is facing many questions today.
➡️American Political Response
Following the attack, American politics became deeply divided.
Republican Party Stance
Demands to halt and revise immigration policies
Temporary suspension of entry procedures for Afghan citizens
Increased deployment of security forces
Democratic Party Stance
Need for mental health support and rehabilitation policies
Wrong to associate all Afghan citizens with terrorism
Defense of policies on humanitarian grounds
➡️Potential Impacts of this Incident
✅ Major changes in Immigration Policy
Screening for refugees entering the US could become extremely stringent.
✅ Stricter Security Laws
Expansion of national security and counter-terrorism laws is possible.
✅ Impact on International Relations
US-Afghanistan relations may appear even weaker.
➡️Social Media and Public Sentiment
On social media after the attack:
Some people spoke in support of Afghan citizens
Some said that not all refugees can be trusted
Concerns were also raised about the negative impact on the Muslim community
➡️Mental Health Aspect
In the last 20 years, mental stress, depression, and PTSD have been widely observed among American soldiers and those associated with the war in Afghanistan. It is also possible that the perpetrator was under similar pressure.
Therefore, the question remains: Should the US increase spending on mental health, not just on security?
➡️Conclusion
This attack near the White House is not just a shooting, but a major question mark over:
International security
Immigration policy
Counter-terrorism strategy
Human rights
Mental health
Rahmanullah Lakhanwal’s Afghanistan connection shows that war is not only fought on the battlefield — its consequences are felt for years to come.
America now stands at a crossroads:
✅ Strict security + closed immigration
✅ Humanitarian policies + thorough scrutiny
The decision made in the coming months could determine the direction of America and the entire world.





